The submission - spark the blaze - or is there really a justice system in America?
Prior postings apparently do not post properly so...
Here is the public html copy of the submission to 6th Circuit via southern Ohio district court.
The clerk apparently opened the envelope, someone read it, then stapled it back shut, and returned the document.
IN Circuit Court (appellate court) for The United States of
America
6th circuit
IN district court of The United States of America
On 06-24-05, Peoples' Counsel received a document issued under
guise of supposed lawful activity, claiming the People have
requested an Appeal [05-3772]. There are no submissions to any
court which show-requested matter under Appeal, particularly to
the Sixth Circuit, as it is documented upon the record, of its'
apparent participation in this criminal activity.
There is, however, a demand under the Peoples' authority for
an ORDER based upon fact rather than what appears to be a
deliberate fraudulent ORDER created by co-conspirators to the
syndicated racketeering occurring in the 6th Circuit,
under its direction and protection.
The People now direct the clerk and court to these facts:
1. At sentence two (par. 1) of body (06-23-05 document signed
by a Michelle M. Davis, some supposed Case Manager in UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS) find:
"Please review the caption for accuracy; it and the case
number must appear on all filings."
Addressed to wit: Improperly, willfully, and
deliberately mis-captioned in DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES by clerks, and park commissioners masquerading as
judges of official capacity, who created three (or more) supposed
Plaintiff parties out of thin air to cover-up the active
participation of these named and listed defendants in apparent
syndicated racketeering and other organized criminal
activities.
In fact: a supposed lawful federal judge, a Mr. Walter
H. Rice, created an entirely new set of plaintiffs, apparently
out of his own wants and desires, not based upon the materials he
supposedly reviewed.
Moreover, assigning Peoples' counsel as plaintiff, in blatant
display of his apparent hostile attitude towards counsel of
parties before the courts presenting their respective positions.
It appears reasonable to state that he has no respect for those
NOT a member of his profession, or his bar.
The proper captioning of all activities is, as modified, and
will remain, pending additional defendant inclusions:
The People and their states of The United States of
America
Plaintiffs
Against
James Bonini;
Thomas M. Ross;
Sharon L. Ovington;
Michael R. Merz;
James A. Higgins;
Danny J. Boggs;
Thomas B. Russell;
Edward H. Johnstone;
W. D. King;
All Sixth circuit parties participating in supposed review of the
Complaint before the 6th Circuit Judicial Counsel
Defendants
Per (01-10-05) 01-13-05 submission:
"Present counsel, in and of the People, has received documents
from USCA, claiming to be a lawful reviewing council,
which has reviewed organized criminal activities occurring within
the circuit, claimed as the 6th. Pursuant that
supposed lawfully accomplished review, those individuals involved
affirm the dismissal of complaint filed against their members for
obstructing justice and otherwise covering-up violations of law,
rules, and other, of United States, and, The United States of
America.Being purported certified and sanctioned judges of United
States, it appears, as previously presented in the submission
to noted parties (12-03-04 and 12-23-04 submissions and receipt
copies and "fax tracks"): these individuals have willfully,
knowingly, andC:\My Documents\Courts and BOC\Federal District
Courts\Ohio\DCUSA-CtCUSA-SCUSA- Notices-additional parties-other
Notices.docPage 2 of 37
with conscious knowledge of their unlawful acts, furthered
this criminal activity within the circuit and The United States
of America as defined by the constitution. Wherefore, those
individuals are hereafter included within this matter as
defendants. A list of such individuals shall be placed upon the
record by the circuit executive.Required by law to have found misconduct and instituted
criminal investigations, these individuals have, instead, acted
in concert, complicity and in conspiracy with others; to defeat
and destroy the law, rules, and other of The United States of
America. Whereby, inflicting irreparable harm and damage upon and
against this nation, the states, and the People."
Fax tracks for above:
"Executive, Office of The Circu","Executive, Office of The
Circu","","+1 (513) 564-7210","Your Notice and document as sent
to DCUSA &
SCUSA","faxsent","","","38","38","0","Fine","okevent","513 564
7210","24 min 48 sec","14400","0","Off","07:23:16
PM","01/13/05","","",""
Partial email tracks for submission:
>From: "ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov" <>
>To: "<"m_brahier@hotmail.com"
m_brahier@hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: Notification, Notices, pdf of DCUSA-CtCUSA-SCUSA
submission
>attached, includes Peoples' evidence 11P-27P
>Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:58:17 -0500 (EST)
>
>Thank you for contacting the Department of Justice. This is
an automatic
>acknowledgement that your e-mail was received. It will be
reviewed in the
>order it was received
_______________
>From: System Administrator <"postmaster@turner.com"
>
>To:"m_brahier@hotmail.com"
>Subject: Undeliverable: FW: Notification, Notices, pdf
of
>DCUSA-CtCUSA-SCUSA submission attached, includes Peoples'
evidence 11P-27P
>Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:58:55 -0500
>
>Your message
>
> To: "mailto:crossfire@cnn.com"
class="c4">crossfire@cnn.com;
"public@nytimes.com" class="c4">public@nytimes.com
>loudobbstonight@turner.com; loudobbs@cnn.com;
wolfblitzer@cnn.com wolfblitzer@cnn.com;
>news-tip@nytimes.com; contact@afp.com
> Subject: FW: Notification, Notices, pdf of
DCUSA-CtCUSA-SCUSA submission
>attached, includes Peoples' evidence 11P-27P
> Sent: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:56:13 -0500
>
>did not reach the following recipient(s):
>
>WOLFBLITZER@CNN.COM on Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:58:40 -0500
> The recipient name is not recognized
> The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a=
>;p=twi;l=CNNCMX060501132058ZZ4CNTDP
> MSEXCH:IMS:TWI:TBSCENTRAL:CNNCMX06 0 (000C05A6) Unknown
Recipient
WHEREFORE, all documents will be modified to match the
actual parties as so stated upon the official records. All
further attempts to place the Peoples' Counsel, as supposed
plaintiff will find such parties added as defendants to this
matter, as previously NOTICED.
2. At paragraph two (2) of the supposed document referencing
an Appeal:
"Before your appeal can proceed any further, the district
court is required to certify whether your appeal is taken in good
faith under ' 1915(a)(3). (blah blah)"
Here we find that named conspirators or other active
participants believe that they will, once again, force an issue;
in which they are named or indicated defendants; before
themselves; for review; of their own active participation in
syndicated racketeering and other organized crimes. Moreover,
should they find "bad faith" then the matter will not
continue.
Moreover, as the issues were brought under the inherent,
inalienable rights of the People of America to review and
potentially clean corruption from their nation (via Special
and/or Grand Jury, and, indictments) under their retained
authority of Amendments 9 and 10; these real or apparent
criminals, will "walk away" having been determined BY THEM that
the matter may not continue due to "lack of merit", or, "bad
faith", or, a failure to file a document which applies to
citizens, persons, and other legal creations. Yet has no
worth, weight, or authority, when weighed against the Peoples'
authority in their nation, and the depth of this apparent
organized criminal activity.
3. At paragraph three (3) this purported case manager show her
apparent arrogance, or makes an unqualified assumption, in which
she states:
"Procedures and filing requirements in the court of appeals
can be complicated or confusing. It is very important to read the
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure,..."
Here is a party that has associated with a court for so long,
and with fellow officers of the court / attorneys; that she
indicates (without saying such) that:
"Here's another idiot coming to MY court, that I'm going to
have to lead by the nose, .. maybe I'll do the same as the
others, which have mishandled these 14 years of cases in evidence
upon the record... I'll have to write recommendations for a case
that would affect my CAREER and retirement..."
Peoples' counsel suggests, instead, this "manager" write the
opposing brief(s) to the seven Volumes of Expose' of
Crimes now in the record, if she feels so competent. Counsel
does have several more Volumes in mind.
As for the Rules of Court or Rules of Procedure: when it is
the judicial system, which is under review by the People, they do
not matter, because those are also under review.
Be these issues tried by the courts, or by the People, there
is now less than four years left before this world which you
think you have created and control, crashes around your ears,
that's if I had to predict.. particularly after this last "nail
in the coffin" of this new "eminent domain" Supreme Court
Ruling.. this one will rise up to haunt you..
CONCLUSION
The matter before the district court is the issuance of an
ORDER based upon fact rather than fallacy, the district court
will make such correction, so the matter might proceed according
to Law, Rule, and Right.
RELIEF
Should the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT refuse to correct it's
own unlawful, illegal activities, the circuit court will issue
mandate as required to correct this unlawful, illegal, and
apparent criminal activity in which UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
is engaged. Moreover, it will compel the lesser court to abide by
its responsibilities to the people by instituting the Special
Grand Jury to review apparent syndicated racketeering and other
organized crimes occurring in the circuit, and elsewhere.
Whereafter, the People will determine which avenue in which to
proceed.
So it be by public post this 11th day July of
2005.
signature block removed
Peoples' counsel
Flesch Reading ease 37.9
Flesch-Kincaid Grade level 12.0
Copies via various methods to:
President [email];
Vice-president [email];
Solicitor General [email via DOJ;
Attorney General [email via DOJ];
Sixth Circuit;
Various News services [email];
Posted upon the Peoples' counsel web
site;[peoplescounsel.orgfree.com]
Posted upon peoplescounsel blog for public copy and Notice
And elsewhere
end of response
- posted by Maurice @ Tuesday, July 19, 2005
