Ruffstuff's Ruffstuff or the "real" world of government, Law, Constitutions and justice
Thursday, March 31, 2005
 
What, huh, OH, yeah there is another world out there
Gees, oh my, haven't posted in awhile,, got caught up in the "real world" for awhile.. had to advise a friend on EPA matters [yeah, consulting].. not uniquely, he did take my advise and is now scrambling,,, such is life...

Where do I begin, SHiavo,,, no let the body go, she hasn't been there for years...

New Patriot 2 enactments... could say they violate the very premise of the Constitution, but wave the falg, sign a hymn, and break out a cold one,, who cares,, not Americans,, to caught up in their own self important lives,,,

Okay, how about the cable News,,, seems CNN has gone religious,,, Fox is still banging the coporate drum, MSNBC is hmmmmmm, a bit of both... the standard networks,, oh who cares... they just mimic the cable companies now.. However, someone should "shove a stick up the behinds" (to put it politely) of these "anchors",, where the heck is the real News anymore,, everythin is just something some "politician friend" or corporate exec wants created as News... or worse still, commetary for the mere sake of sensationalism, to create a story... another chapter in "The Stupification of America"..

THE COURTS???? Now here's a viable subject... But then when attorneys sit the bench one must always question the motavation of the issues allowed before them.. is it constitutional?? If they wish it to be,,,{gotta make money}; "old people" have rights, wow really, there's a news flash for you; yet not so strangely, the People's case I presented under their supreme authority, was returned...

Okay. sorry, off tempo here,, I promise to get back "on track"...

Oh,, would like a few links to the site.... been spending most "free time" trying to get them... you could help you know...

Saturday, March 19, 2005
 
Congress, Heros, villians
  If anyone has been monitoring the US Congress (as if) they should have noted a number of rather questionable activities seem to have come to the forefront. Congress tried to block removal of feeding tube from the woman in Florida by issuing a Subpoena.. so once again we see Congress abusing its power... on the other side we see them weighing in on steroid usage,, sure let's have another federal law, which will cause more problems than it solves,,, does anybody care????

  The "Hero" term has become such a widely used term now, that anyone is now a "hero" if they do anything,,, ANYTHING in America which might happen to make the News...
  Where or perhaps when did doing your job make you a "hero"? When did killing, regardless of military service in support of government, become "hero" work? When did creating a new government agency make you a "hero"?
  To be a "hero" prior to the "WAR" one had to actually save somone or a group of people, like a firefighter entering a burning building and saving an elderly person or child... or a police officer saving some trapped motorist from a life threatening situation.. or some every day "Joe or Joesephine" saving someone from something harmful...
  So who are the heros now??? No matter how much the parents of soldiers killed in some war somewhere wish their child called a "hero", the term connotates something more...

  In contrast, the world is now supposedly filled with "villians",,, those who just don't quite fit in to the "normal" outlook of society.. yet who would be a greater villian, the supposed "terrorist" or the ones who quietly corrupt governments from within? One is visible, their damage can be seen and is shown on the News. The other is unseen, hidden, working covertly to acheive private agendas,, yet possible causing more deaths, more destruction, more chaos than the visible.. here the damage is not instant, but long in exposure,,, people get used to the activity, it becomes the "norm"...
  Is the world now a safer place to live in? Hardly....
  Is the United States now safer,,, Hardly, yet billions have been spent,, but where?

  New intrusive Laws become, after time, acceptable, no, the people foget what they lost, just the Law, unquestioned, unpatriotic to do so...
  "Activists" lose their way on the way to acheiving their own goals, side track into oblivion, complacency....
  And the world turns the page to "acceptable containment" called "national security"...

Saturday, March 12, 2005
 
Well due to the lack of support United States continues its criminal activities - as presented to various supposed activist and People's sites

[03-07-05 the Supreme Court sends back Amendment 9 and 10 People's case]

Let me introduce myself, I am a People's counsel, who just tried to get the
Supreme Court to review seven briefs which expose most of the issues which
Americans are subject under, and subjected too. As of today, the Supreme
Court returned the materials, which were submitted under People's authority
under Amendments 9 and 10. Issues were the people's authority to prosecute
individuals engaged in organized racketeering and other organized crimes
when the government refuses to do so. Reason, it is those of government
involved.

I do NOT wish to be added to your email, nor do I wish your mailing lists,
as these cases take most of my time. I do wish for the information
concerning these cases and the People's site "get out".
I am not in "competition with you". There is no advertising on this site or
the blogs.

The information does need to get out though. Please review the Expose`
volumes and other materials on the site. There is also a southern district
of Ohio case as well....

The site is:
http://free.hostdepartment.com/R/Ruffstuffs_Ruffstuff/default.htm

blogs which I do not care if you advise others of are concerning the site
and other:
http://Ruffstuffsruffstuff.blogspot.com
http://spaces.msn.com/members/peoplescounsel/

I will be trying to raise the $300.00 for the Supreme Court case. If I can,
then briefs may be submitted to the court by anyone interested, though
please brush up on the proper form and style.

This is YOUR case.... it would be nice to find the supposed support for
it..


Thursday, March 10, 2005
 
Senate passes Bankruptcy Bill and helps to create the new indentured servant class
  The Senate has passed a bill that will ensure many Americans spend the rest of their lives essentially indentured, never to relieve themselves from possible bankruptcy.. while ensuring that the corporate executives, the "rich", and of course as they will be well off when they "retire", themselves, the ability to hide money in "homestead accounts" and other loopholes only they can access.

  For the regular people, we will find ourselves ever deeper in debt, though now unable to relieve ourselves from some or all of it. Medical bankrupcies, will be so hard to obtain, that they will destroy the lower and middle classes, eat up any "estates" which might have been left. Moreover, as there is no national health care, this forces families, young adults, and the elderly to choose whether to eat, live, or perhaps it's better to die, as they may no longer be able to pay the rising cost of health care, and should they live, no way to free themselves from debts they can't pay...

  Let's review what this new "regime" [remember the evidence this is an unlawfully obtained election is IN the courts right now (see the web site, duh)] has or is accomplishing so far:

  Social Secuity in "private accounts" so they can be wiped out by stock market crashes, and which will NEVER produce the supposed outcome, as the ecomony will be adjusted to whatever medien level is leaving the lower caste without the ability to retire;
  No, or, reduced, medical bankruptcies so the poor, lower, middle classes must choose to live or die, or be stuck in a "rut" they will NEVER get out of should they have a catastrofic illness or health problems;
  Cut backs (due to rising health care costs) in medicare, and medicaide, so those in need can be reduced in population do to lack of proper medicines and other;
  LOTS of money for defense industries which most politicians have stock in or connections with;
  New laws added to the "Patriot Act" which allow indepth investigations upon most if not all Americans (cause we are all "potential terrorists");
  More attempts to Amend the Constitution beyond the marriage aspect (as if that isn't bad enough);

And on and on. (Is that "Taps" I hear in the background?)

  One can hear the death rasp of a "free" America, as she returns to a "business" run indentured prison...

Wednesday, March 09, 2005
 
Due to apathy of Americans, Supreme Court returns the case
AS SENT TO SUPPOSED "Activist sites" and others ranting but doing apparently nothing
 
[03-07-05 the Supreme Court sends back Amendment 9 and 10 People's case]
 
 Let me introduce myself, I am a People's counsel, who just tried to get the Supreme Court to review seven briefs which expose most of the issues which Americans are subject under, and subjected too. As of today, the Supreme Court returned the materials, which were submitted under People's authority under Amendments 9 and 10. Issues were the people's authority to prosecute individuals engaged in organized racketeering and other organized crimes when the government refuses to do so. Reason? It is those of government involved.
 
 I do NOT wish to be added to your email, nor do I wish your mailing lists, as these cases take most of my time. I do wish for the information concerning these cases and the People's site "get out".
I am not in "competition with you". There is no advertising on this site or the blogs.
 
 The information does need to get out though. Please review the Expose`
volumes and other materials on the site. There is also a southern district
of Ohio case as well....
 
The site is:
http://free.hostdepartment.com/R/Ruffstuffs_Ruffstuff/default.htm
 
blogs which I do not care if you advise others of are concerning the site and other:
http://Ruffstuffsruffstuff.blogspot.com
http://spaces.msn.com/members/peoplescounsel/
 
 I will be trying to raise the $300.00 for the Supreme Court case. If I can,
then briefs may be submitted to the court by anyone interested, though
please brush up on the proper form and style.
 
This is YOUR case.... it would be nice to find the supposed support for
it..

[bold was added to this blog posting for emphasis]

Monday, March 07, 2005
 
Nothing new or really News

I have been flicking through the supposed News channels for the last few
days searching for any notice of the People's case submitted to the Supreme
Court. Remember I submitted most of the materials directly to them prior to
the Supreme Court demand.

RESULTS: nada

Why would that be? It is certainly News worthy particularly as it does
deal with the elections last year, business, corporate matters, and numerous
other. In fact I note the site is no longer listed upon most search
engines, though it was listed upon at least 15. Not even google lists the
site anymore, as found anywhere. DMOZ was presented with the site at least 7
times now, yet still no listing. Not even when put in the unpopular
categories [activism, and other off the "norm" stuff].

So what could cause that? Perhaps (mere conjecture?) the attorneys,
government or corporations have leveraged this loss. Why would they do that?

As this case does deal with the elections, government cover-ups, taxes,
judicial misconduct and corruption, and numerous other ills in America,
these certainly are NOT what the "aristocracy" [those who actually control
us] wishes Americans or the world to be concerned with during this "war".

But wait, this "war" appears more as a corporate war, e.g. the control of
oil, American military bases in the middle east, obviously, but more
importantly perhaps, is the control of markets, and people. Not a popular
idea by any means, certainly not "patriotic", yet looking the other way
while this occurs is not our responsibility to ourselves, our children, nor
the world.

So the matters rest in the clerks office of the Supreme Court, passed
around governments and the "legal Profession". While the world goes its
merry way down the "golden path" which ends where?
Surprisingly, you, who read this are deciding this issue. Have you passed
this on to friends, others who might actually find these issues important?


Saturday, March 05, 2005
 
Doomsday bill passes House and a new consumption tax

Once again congress shows a strange willingness to subvert the
Constitution.
The House passed a bill to make 45 days the time to hold elections should
terrorists strike and kill over a hundred of them.
Congress had tried (and will probably try again) for a constitutional
Amendment to change the replacement to "appointment of their own successor".
Why do we find all these Republican attempts to cause Amendment of the
Constitution? Because each recent Amendment attempt brings with it, its own
hidden agenda. Loss of Rights, and destruction of the body of the contract.
Placing more control in the hands of the very people who were to be limited
and constrained in their authority by the original contract.
This may also place them in the position of "target". A behind the scenes
manipulation by a close "friend" as the "successor", and an "accident", and
behold, a way to achieve elected office without election. As if its not
enough that governors and or state legislatures can already do the
replacements. Moreover, as if the country can not continue without congress
for a short period... The President already declares war whenever he feels
like it.

How much longer do we have to wait for them to try to completely re-write
the Constitution? Oh, wait, they tried that when they first gained control
of congress (104th Congress).

As if the social security reform would not cause enough harm and damage to
the middle class and poor, the federal government now wishes to place a
"consumption tax" on the national level. If it were limited to "high dollar
items" (luxury tax) it might be viable, but even then, once emplaced,
regular consumables will be taxed... food, water, where does it stop. Cuts
in Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other... certainly will not be
where the "money" is placed. More for "defense", Home Land Security, CIA,
and "war".


Wednesday, March 02, 2005
 
A new month, Supreme Court makes a good decision for children on death row

03/02/05
The Supreme Court determines children committing crimes for which the death
penalty was being applied, can not be enforced.
America joins the rest of the world in this determination.

The arguments for such are rather untenable.

Many soldiers, policemen, and others who kill in the line of "work" have
difficulty dealing with what has occurred. Children obviously have no
concept of what death truly is. Most adults have difficulty accepting death,
in general, but the finality of it rarely "strikes" someone until the very
end.

Compare it to the parents in Florida, attempting to keep their grown and
married "child" alive, apparently against her former wishes, and her
husband.
Compare it with the parents of a premature or severely deformed child, who
will never be able to function (literally), or is kept alive for a few hours
or days, so new parents have a chance to adjust to the reality of the loss,
and one can find the intense desire for life humans have. If there is the
desire for those afflicted, how can there be no desire and compassion for
those gone wrong?

There must be a balance somewhere.

Having taken a life as a child, is it then growing into age [insert "label"
adult] and older intelligence that then makes one responsible for some
terrible crime, when the child had no concept or "reality" of what it was
doing? There are no "sciences" which explain this activity in children.
Perhaps its time to really apply ourselves to this problem.

When an adult keeps someone from their ultimate end, subjecting them to
unknowable hurt, pain or suffering, would this not also be a heinous act?
Yet society accepts this, the demand of the parent for a bit of time,
outweighs the pain or suffering of the child.

There are those who would say, "You have not lost someone to that type of
crime. You don't understand."
Perhaps they are right, I do not understand it in that "light", though I
have lost numerous members of my own family.
Yet, on the other hand, perhaps they should stand back, and try to remember
what life was about before the tragedy. Where did that understanding go?

REMEMBER THE SUPREME COURT WRIT IS IN, as either the demand for Writ or
original action, though no present case assignment, if anyone cares to
submit petitions in support, or, briefs.



Powered by Blogger